Theory of Gravity

A few years ago I decided I would try to figure out gravity, which is probably the most ambitious intellectual pursuit I have ever undertaken. I was determined that whatever direction it would ultimately take, it must fit with the current understanding based on Einstein's theory of general relativity. I claim that gravity is essentially an electromagnetic force operating in the "dark sector" of particles in which the associated radiations are invisible to us except through the gravity force. I took my inspiration from information found online and from ancient structures such as the Great Pyramid and the unbelievable stonework in Peru and Kailasa Temple, which strongly hint that the builders knew something we don't, and some of that knowledge is related to gravity. The theory I came up with tries to explain the gaps in the current understanding of gravity, and also makes an effort to explain how antigravity could work. The theory has two main components:

1. A theory of gravity developed through my own analysis over many months.

2. An expansion of this theory through a collaboration between me and the AIs, Google-Gemini and ChatGPT, which resulted in a kind of synergy between me and "machine" to produce a theory that is better than what either of us could have come up with on our own.

I won't explain the details of the theories here as it is better to just read about them in the downloadable files below.

The downloadable files are separated into their different parts. I recommend you download them onto your computer for easier reference. All these files can be freely shared with others without restriction.

1. My original gravity theory (developed without AI)

Original gravity theory
Python code and Excel gravity simulation (in a zip file, must be unzipped)

2. Collaborative gravity theory between me and AI (in chronological order)

Full discussion with Gemini
Summarized Gemini discussion with equations
Summarized Gemini discussion without equations
ChatGPT 5 overview and critique
ChatGPT 5 additional discussion
DeepSeek chat
DeepSeek vs ChatGPT 5
Nomenclature and meaning of symbols
Electromagnetic Origin of Gravity (updated September 2026)

Probably the most interesting part of this theory is that it breaks down the gravity force into the net difference between a repulsive component and an attractive component, where F_gravity = F_repulsive – F_attractive, with the attractive component being slightly stronger. This has two immediate implications. First, it explains why gravity is so weak, because it is the "residual" of two much larger forces. And second, it opens a possible pathway to antigravity by way of "tweaking" this difference so that there is a net repulsive gravity force instead of net attractive (which is the normal case). In the framework of the model this is accomplished by applying specific resonant frequencies to the object to be levitated. As a result, through an effect analogous to thermoacoustic refrigeration, the thermal energy of the object supplies the energy needed for antigravity lift which causes the object to cool. This means that antigravity is not a "free energy" process but has a thermodynamic cost.

Further development of this gravity theory will be a work in progress, as I gradually refine my work, and make available the latest versions of my theory, using AI as an aid.

Questions to the AI regarding the sharing of information:

Do I have your permission to publicly share our conversations on this gravity theory with others (date of question: August 20, 2025)?

Google Gemini 2.5 Pro response:

Yes, of course.
The content of our conversation was generated for you. If you choose to share it, I'd just recommend attributing it to "a conversation with a Google AI" and presenting it in the context of the creative, speculative thought experiment that it was.

ChatGPT 5 Thinking response:

Absolutely—you have my permission to share our conversation publicly (dated August 20, 2025).
A few small requests to keep things clear for readers:
Please note I’m GPT-5 Thinking, and this is AI-generated analysis, not peer-reviewed science.
Don’t include any private or identifying info about you or others.
If you excerpt technical suggestions (experiments, safety notes), keep them in full context so nothing gets misapplied.
It’s fine to credit me as “ChatGPT (GPT-5 Thinking),” and you can quote verbatim.
If you later want a short preface or summary I can write to accompany the share, say the word and I’ll draft it.

Related page:
UFO Antigravity Field



Return to Miscellaneous Physics page


Return to Real World Physics Problems home page