Gyroscope Physics
Gyroscope physics is one of the most difficult concepts to understand in simple terms. When people see a spinning gyroscope precessing about an axis, the question is inevitably asked why that happens, since it goes against intuition. But as it turns out, there is a fairly straightforward way of understanding the physics of gyroscopes without using a lot of math.
But before I get into the details of that, it's a good idea to see how a gyroscope works (if you haven't already). Click on the link below to see a video of a toy gyroscope in action.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cquvA_IpEsA (opens in new window)
As you've probably noticed, a gyroscope can behave very similar to a spinning top. Gyroscope physics can therefore be applied directly to a spinning top.
To start off, let's illustrate a typical gyroscope using a schematic as shown below.
Where:
w_{s} is the constant rate of spin of the wheel, in radians/second
w_{p} is the constant rate of precession, in radians/second
L is the length of the rod
r is the radius of the wheel
θ is the angle between the vertical and the rod (a constant)
As the wheel spins at a rate
w_{s}, the gyroscope precesses at a rate
w_{p} about the pivot at the base (with
θ constant).
The question is, why doesn't the gyroscope fall down due to gravity?!
The reason is this:
Due to the combined rotation
w_{s} and
w_{p}, the particles in the top half of the spinning wheel experience a component of acceleration
a_{1} normal to the wheel (with distribution as shown in the figure below), and the particles in the bottom half of the wheel experience a component of acceleration
a_{2} normal to the wheel in the opposite direction (with distribution as shown). Due to Newton’s second law, this means that a net force
F_{1} must act on the particles in the top half of the wheel, and a net force
F_{2} must act on the particles in the bottom half of the wheel. These forces act in opposite directions. Therefore a clockwise torque
M is needed to sustain these forces. The force of gravity pulling down on the gyroscope creates the necessary clockwise torque
M.
In other words, due to the nature of the kinematics, the particles in the wheel experience acceleration in such a way that the force of gravity is able to maintain the angle
θ of the gyroscope as it precesses. This is the most basic explanation behind the gyroscope physics.
As an analogy, consider a particle moving around in a circle at a constant velocity. The acceleration of the particle is towards the center of the circle (centripetal acceleration), which is perpendicular to the velocity of the particle (tangent to the circle). This may seem counterintuitive, but the lesson here is that the acceleration of an object can act in a direction that is very different from the direction of motion. This can result in some interesting physics, such as a gyroscope not falling over due to gravity as it precesses.
So now that we have an intuitive "feel" for gyroscope physics, we can analyze it in full using a mathematical approach. We will hence determine the equation of motion for the gyroscope.
Gyroscope Physics — Analysis
The general schematic for analyzing gyroscope physics is shown below.
where
g is the acceleration due to gravity, point
G is the center of mass of the wheel, and point
P is the pivot location at the base.
The global
XYZ axes is fixed to ground and has origin at
P.
I,
J, and
K are defined as unit vectors pointing along the positive
X,
Y, and
Z axis respectively.
The angular velocity of the wheel, with respect to ground, is
The angular acceleration of the wheel, with respect to ground, is
Looking at the first term:
Looking at the second term:
Therefore,
The angular velocity of the rod, with respect to ground, is
The angular acceleration of the rod, with respect to ground, is zero since
w_{r} is constant and does not change direction.
Note that the terms
dJ/dt and
dK/dt (given above) are calculated using vector differentiation. To learn more about it visit the
vector derivative page.
Gyroscope Physics — Wheel Analysis
Let's analyze the forces and moments acting on the wheel, due to contact with the rod. A freebody diagram of the wheel (isolated from the rod) is given below. Note that a local
xyz axes is defined as shown, and is attached to the wheel so that it moves with the wheel, and has origin at point
G.
Where:
M_{x} is the moment acting in the local
xdirection, at point
G
M_{y} is the moment acting in the local
ydirection, at point
G
M_{z} is the moment acting in the local
zdirection, at point
G
F_{GX} is the force acting in the global
Xdirection, at point
G
F_{GY} is the force acting in the global
Ydirection, at point
G
F_{GZ} is the force acting in the global
Zdirection, at point
G
Apply Newton's Second Law to the wheel:
Where:
m_{w} is the mass of the wheel
a_{GX} is the acceleration of point
G in the global
Xdirection
a_{GY} is the acceleration of point
G in the global
Ydirection
a_{GZ} is the acceleration of point
G in the global
Zdirection
Since point
G is traveling in a horizontal circle at constant velocity we have no tangential acceleration, so
a_{GX} = 0, and
F_{GX} = 0. So we only need to consider the second and third equation.
The second equation is,
Since point
G is traveling in a horizontal circle at constant velocity we have centripetal acceleration. The centripetal acceleration points towards the center of rotation, therefore
The third equation is,
Since point
G is traveling in a horizontal circle at constant velocity we have
a_{GZ} = 0. Thus,
Therefore,
Next, apply the Euler equations of motion for a rigid body, given that
xyz is aligned with the principal directions of inertia of the wheel (treated as a solid disk).
We have,
Now,
This is the angular velocity of the wheel (with respect to ground) resolved along the local
xyz axes.
Furthermore,
This is the angular acceleration of the wheel (with respect to ground) resolved along the local
xyz axes.
Thus, the second and third of Euler's equations are equal to zero, therefore Σ
M_{Gy} =
M_{y} = 0, and Σ
M_{Gz} =
M_{z} = 0. As a result, the second and third equations do not contribute to the solution. (Note that
F_{GX},
F_{GY}, and
F_{GZ} do not exert a moment (torque) about point
G, since they are defined as coincident with point
G  i.e. the length of the moment arm is zero).
Therefore, we only need to consider the first equation:
Where:
Σ
M_{Gx} is the sum of the moments about point
G, in the local
xdirection. Note that Σ
M_{Gx} =
M_{x}.
I_{Gx},
I_{Gy}, and
I_{Gz} are the principal moments of inertia of the wheel about point
G about the local
x,
y, and
z directions (respectively).
By symmetry (treat the wheel as a thin circular disk),
and
Therefore,
Gyroscope Physics — Rod Analysis
In this part of the gyroscope physics analysis we analyze the moments acting on the rod about point
P. A freebody diagram of the rod (isolated from the wheel) is given below. Note that a local
xyz axes is defined as shown, and is attached to the rod so that it moves with the rod, and has origin at point
P. The
xyz axes is aligned with the principal directions of inertia of the rod.
Note that point
P is treated as a frictionless pivot. Therefore it exerts no moment (torque) on the rod. Since we are summing moments about
P (which is a fixed point) we can use the moment (Euler) equations directly.
Now,
This is the angular velocity of the rod (with respect to ground) resolved along the local
xyz axes, and
This is the angular acceleration of the rod (with respect to ground) resolved along the local
xyz axes.
Thus, the second and third of Euler's equations are equal to zero, and they do not contribute to the solution.
Therefore, we only need to consider the first equation:
Where:
Σ
M_{Px} is the sum of the moments about point
P, in the local
xdirection
I_{Px},
I_{Py}, and
I_{Pz} are the principal moments of inertia of the rod about point
P about the local
x,
y, and
z directions (respectively).
By symmetry,
and
where
m_{r} is the mass of the rod.
Therefore,
Combine equations (1)(4) and we get:
This is a nice compact equation describing the gyroscope physics. We can solve for any one of the values
θ,
w_{p}, or
w_{s} if the other two values are known.
We can write a more general equation in which we replace the gyroscope wheel with any axisymmetric rotating body (with symmetry about the local
y axis):
Where:
If we assume the mass of the rod is negligible, then
m_{r} =
I_{r} =
I_{Py} = 0, and the above equation simplifies to a general equation for uniform gyroscopic motion with negligible rod mass:
In the next section on gyroscope physics we will look at gyroscopic stability, which is a very important and practical application of gyroscopes.
Gyroscope Physics — Gyroscopic Stability
From the
angular momentum page we derived the following equation for a rigid body:
The term on the left is defined as the external impulse acting on the rigid body (between initial time
t_{i} and final time
t_{f}), due to the sum of the external moments (torque) acting on the rigid body. The terms on the right are the final angular momentum vector (
H_{f}), and the initial angular momentum vector (
H_{i}).
Although the above equation was derived for a rigid body it also applies to any system of particles (whether they comprise a rigid or non rigid body). The proof of this is commonly found in classical mechanics textbooks.
As is explained on the
angular momentum page, the above equation applies for the two cases, where the local
xyz axes has its origin at the center of mass
G of the rigid body, or at a fixed point
O on the rigid body (if there is one). In the remainder of this section on gyroscope physics, we will apply the former, so the moments, inertia terms, and angular momentum are all with respect to
G.
To illustrate the concept of gyroscopic stability let's say we have an axisymmetric rigid object (such as a wheel) spinning in space with angular velocity
w, at a given instant.
In the above figure, the change in the angular momentum vector between time
t_{i} and
t_{f} is given by
ΔH, and according to the above equation
ΔH is equal to the external impulse (due to the sum of the external moments acting between time
t_{i} and
t_{f}).
For a given
ΔH (which is equal to the external impulse), the angle
φ decreases as
H_{i} increases. This means that the greater the magnitude of the initial angular momentum (
H_{i}), the smaller the angle
φ is for a given external impulse. Now, the magnitude of the angular momentum vector
H is proportional to the magnitude of the angular velocity vector
w. Therefore, the faster the object is spinning, the smaller the resulting angle
φ is for a given external impulse.
If there are no external moments (torque) acting on the object then we say that the object is experiencing torque free motion. Thus, from the above equation,
H_{i} =
H_{f}, and
φ = 0. Therefore, the angular momentum vector has constant magnitude and direction, and angular momentum is conserved.
For an axisymmetric rigid object experiencing torque free motion, the precession axis is seen (from the point of view of an observer) to coincide with the angular momentum vector, and this precession axis defines the average orientation of the object. And since this precession axis defines the average orientation of the object, then a small change in direction of the angular momentum vector (corresponding to a small
φ, due to an external impulse) means a small change in the average orientation of the object. This of course means that
after the external impulse is applied, the object is once again experiencing torque free motion.
Hence, a fast spinning axisymmetric object, experiencing torque free motion, is able to maintain its precession axis (and hence average orientation) with very little change, if an external impulse is applied.
Gyroscope physics sheds light on why mounting a spinning wheel (powered by a motor) in a gimbal (metal frame) is so useful for navigation. The spinning wheel is mounted in the gimbal so as to be free of external torque. Therefore, given its already inherent orientation stability (as well as the fact that external torque is almost completely eliminated), the gyroscope experiences extremely little orientation change as a result. This is why gyroscopes are commonly used in navigation, such as in boats and ships. They tend to remain level even if the boat or ship changes orientation (either by pitching or rolling). The figure below illustrates a gyroscopegimbal unit.
Source:
Wikipedia via
Kieff
Gyroscopic stability also explains why a spinning axisymmetric projectile, such as a football, can have its symmetric (long) axis stay aligned with its flight trajectory, without tumbling end over end when in flight. The spin imparts a gyroscopic response to the aerodynamic forces acting on the projectile, which results in the projectile long axis aligning itself with the flight trajectory. The physics involved here is a combination of gyroscopic analysis and aerodynamic force analysis due to drag and (potentially) the Magnus effect. This is quite complicated and will not be discussed here. However, there is a lot of literature available online on gyroscope physics, as related to projectile spin and gyroscopic stability, if one wishes to study this topic further.
Next in the gyroscope physics analysis, we will show that for an axisymmetric rigid body experiencing torque free motion, the precession axis is seen (from the point of view of an observer in the inertial reference frame) to coincide with the angular momentum vector, which we know is fixed in inertial (ground) space, with constant magnitude and direction.
Gyroscope Physics — Torque Free Motion
Consider the figure below with local
xyz axes as shown.
Let's find an equation that relates the angle
θ (between
H and
w_{s}) to the vectors
H and
w_{s}. A simple way to do this is with the vector dot product:
Where:
H has been replaced with
H_{G} (since we are using the angular momentum about the center of mass
G of the object)
j is a unit vector pointing along the positive
y axis

H_{G} is the magnitude of the vector
H_{G}
Differentiate the above equation with respect to time to give
which gives the following equation for
dθ/dt:
From the
vector derivative page we know that:
From the
angular momentum page:
Where:
i,
k are unit vectors pointing along the positive
x and
z axis, respectively
w_{x},
w_{y},
w_{z} are the components of the angular velocity vector of the object (with respect to ground), resolved along the
x,
y,
z directions, respectively
I_{x},
I_{y},
I_{z} are the principal moments of inertia about the
x,
y,
z directions, respectively
Substitute the above three equations into the equation for
dθ/dt and we get
This is an informative equation coming out of the gyroscope physics analysis done here. It tells us that for
I_{x} =
I_{z},
dθ/dt = 0 (as the object rotates through space). But if we choose
α = 0 then the precession axis coincides with the angular momentum vector
H_{G}, and as a result
w_{x} =
dθ/dt = 0 (which simplifies the calculations). Hence, the angle
θ is constant and this is why, from the point of view of an observer in the inertial reference frame, the precession axis appears to coincide with the angular momentum vector. But mathematically speaking it does not matter what axis we choose as the precession axis, since it is simply a component of rotation. Being able to arbitrarily choose the precession axis is similar to how you can arbitrarily choose the x,y directions for a force calculation. Ultimately the answer is the same and the resultant force is not going to change. To understand this better you can read up on
Euler angles which are commonly used to define the angular orientation of a body, using the concept of precession, spin, and nutation (which have been used in the gyroscope physics analysis presented here).
Using the above result for
I_{x} =
I_{z} ≡
I_{w}, let's now find an equation relating
w_{s} and
w_{p}. Since
θ is always constant we can express the angular momentum as follows in terms of its
x,y,z components:
Now, from before
which can be written as (to match notation used previously):
We can equate the
i,j,k components to give:
But from geometry we can also write:
Solving the above equations for
w_{p} and
w_{s} we get
Hence,
w_{p} and
w_{s} are constant.
If we eliminate
H_{G} from the above two equations we get
Note that this is the same as the equation given previously for uniform gyroscopic motion with negligible rod mass:
for the case
L = 0. For
L = 0, this equation reduces to torque free motion for an axisymmetric body.
The next section contains some additional information related to gyroscope physics, that is worth mentioning.
Gyroscope Physics — Additional Information
An axisymmetric object, experiencing torque free motion, that is experiencing pure spinning
w_{s} about its symmetry axis (with no precession,
w_{p} = 0) will have its angular momentum vector aligned with the spin axis, which is easy to understand. However, if this object is temporarily subjected to an external moment it will likely begin to precess as well as spin, and its (new) precession axis will coincide with the new angular momentum vector, which will no longer coincide with the spin axis. To calculate the new motion of the object due to the applied external moment, you need to solve the Euler equations of motion. These will allow you to mathematically determine the new quantities
w_{s},
w_{p}, and
θ, due to the applied external moment. After the external moment has been applied, these quantities will correspond to torque free motion.
In problems such as gyroscope physics analysis, solving the Euler equations of motion is necessary when moments are applied, since these equations directly account for them.
In torque free motion, the only external force acting on an object is at most gravity, which acts through the center of mass (
G) of the object. The object is said to be experiencing torque free motion, since no torque (moment) is able to rotate the object about its center of mass, and thus the angular momentum about the center of mass does not change. It can therefore be assumed (for visualization purposes) that the center of rotation of the object is located at its center of mass
G, since the angular momentum calculations (about
G) are not affected by this assumption. This is why in torque free motion problems the angular velocity vector is typically shown passing through the center of mass of the object being analysed.
In the next section on gyroscope physics we will analyze a general case of gyroscope motion. This is undoubtedly very useful since it can apply to many different problems.
Gyroscope Physics — General Gyroscope Motion
In this final section on gyroscope physics we shall analyze a general case of gyroscope motion, as shown on the
gyro top page. The gyro top shown there illustrates a state of general motion. The kinematic equations are already derived on the gyro top page so we can use those directly.
Assume that there is no friction anywhere.
Gyroscope Physics — Wheel Analysis
From the gyro top page, the angular velocity of the gyroscope wheel is given by equation (1) on that page:
where the variables in this equation are defined in the gyro top page. Note that the term on the left has been replaced with
w_{w} in order to match the notation used here.
From the gyro top page, the angular acceleration of the gyroscope wheel is given by equation (2) on that page:
where the variables in this equation are defined in the gyro top page. Note that the term on the left has been replaced with
α_{w} in order to match the notation used here.
From the gyro top page, point
O on the wheel can be treated as the center of mass of the wheel (
G). Therefore, for notation purposes,
a_{o} on the left side of equation (5) on the gyro top page can be replaced with
a_{G}.
After applying some considerable algebra to equation (5), and simplifying, we get the acceleration of the center of mass
G of the gyroscope wheel:
where the variables in this equation are defined in the gyro top page.
Consider next the following schematic of the gyroscope wheel (used previously), with variables previously defined. The same basic gyroscope physics analysis as used before will be used here. Now, even though the gyroscope wheel rotates through space, the setup below can be used with local
xyz always oriented as shown, for every stage of the motion. This can be done because the wheel is axisymmetric so that the principal moments of inertia do not change relative to
xyz, as the wheel rotates.
By Newton's second law:
Substitute the acceleration terms for the center of mass
G into the above three equations, and we get the following force equations for the gyroscope wheel:
The angular velocity and angular acceleration of the gyroscope wheel is given with respect to the global
XYZ axes. Using trigonometry we will resolve these onto the local
xyz axes of the gyroscope wheel.
We get
and
Set
Apply the Euler equations of motion to the gyroscope wheel:
Next, consider the following schematic of the rod, with variables previously defined. The same basic analysis method as used before will be used here.
Gyroscope Physics — Rod Analysis
Since the local
xyz axes for the rod and wheel have the same orientation, we can find the resolved components of the angular velocity and angular acceleration of the rod by simply setting
w_{s} = 0 and
α_{s} = 0 in the equations for the angular velocity and angular acceleration of the wheel. This gives us
For the rod
Note that since point
P is treated as a frictionless pivot it exerts no moment (torque) on the rod.
Since we are summing moments about
P (which is a fixed point) we can use the moment (Euler) equations directly.
In the equation for Σ
M_{Py} above, note that
F_{GX},
F_{GY},
F_{GZ}, and gravity does not exert a moment about the local
y axis.
Substitute the force equations and Euler equations for the gyroscope wheel into the above three equations and simplify. We then get the final three equations with which to solve for the general gyroscope motion:
According to the sign convention used,
Let's assume we have a massless rod where
m_{r} = 0.
We can rewrite equation (6) as
Therefore,
where
C_{1} is a constant.
We can rewrite equation (7) as
Therefore,
where
C_{2} is a constant.
From equations (8) and (9) we get
To solve this problem we first need to set boundary conditions. Let's choose the following.
For
θ =
θ_{o}, set
w_{n} =
w_{p} = 0, and
w_{s} =
w_{so}. This results in
Substitute equation 10 (for
w_{p}) into equation (5) and set
Simplify equation (5) and then perform (very tedious) integration to obtain an equation for
w_{n}. We get
The angular velocities
w_{n},
w_{p}, and
w_{s} in equations 1012 can be numerically integrated with respect to time to determine the corresponding orientation angles, as a function of time. The name given to these three orientation angles (corresponding to
w_{n},
w_{p}, and
w_{s}) is
Euler angles, which are a common way to define the orientation of any rigid body in threedimensional space.
Equations 1012 mathematically describe the motion of any axisymmetric body attached to and rotating on a massless rod attached to a frictionless pivot, with axis of symmetry of the body pointing in the direction of the rod axis. These are undoubtedly a nice set of equations coming out of the gyroscope physics analysis for general motion.
Equations 1012 also apply for an axisymmetric top pivoted about point
P, with point
P lying on the symmetry axis. In this case
L is the distance from point
P to the center of mass
G of the top. And the inertia terms are calculated about the center of mass
G of the top (as was done for the gyroscope wheel).
The motion predicted by equations 1012 is known as cuspidal motion, based on the boundary conditions given previously.
Gyroscope Physics — Closing Remarks
This completes the gyroscope physics analysis. As you can see, gyroscope physics is a complex subject worthy of deeper understanding. It is hoped that you have gained a real sense of how gyroscopes work, as well as inspired some curiosity to look into them further on your own.
An intuitive explanation for gyroscope physics was given near the start of the page. This explanation works well to explain how a gyroscope experiencing constant rates of precession and spin can maintain a constant angle
θ. But in the gyroscope physics analysis given above, the gyroscope first falls from angle
θ_{o} and then starts to precess, while also experiencing cyclical angle change
θ. Intuition fails to explain why this happens, which is often the case in physics when dealing with complex problems. But perhaps a decent explanation for this is to use a spring analogy. If a mass is hanging from a spring while in equilibrium, the vertical position of the mass will not change. But if that mass is raised and then released from rest it will oscillate vertically up and down. The system is no longer in equilibrium and the oscillatory motion is simply a physical way to "correct" an imbalance of forces. The same basic idea applies to a gyroscope that is released from rest, which can perhaps help you understand the gyroscopic physics taking place.
Return from Gyroscope Physics to Miscellaneous Physics page
Return from Gyroscope Physics to Real World Physics Problems home page